<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP-based Mobile Network Operator: Skype MNO?</title>
	<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/</link>
	<description>Mobile, Security, Web 2.0, Pipe Dreams and More</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: It&#8217;s hip2b2 (Mobile, Security, Web 2.0, Pipe Dreams and More) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Voice-over-WiFi (VoWiFi) in the Philippines?</title>
		<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-299</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-299</guid>
					<description>[...] I caught a syndicated New York Times article on Voice-over-IP (VoIP) on Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) networks. I went to the Philstar.com website but didn&#8217;t find a soft copy of it. However, it definitely is in the print version. Anyway, to get straight to the point, the article says that Voice-over-IP over WiFi (which I will from this moment on call VoWiFi) is definitely an interesting piece of new technology but will face fierce resistance from the incumbent mobile network operators. The scenario the MNOs probably fear is the one I presented in my previous blog on a purely IP-based Mobile Network Operator. Some provider will might take this opportunity to create a wireless voice overlay using all IP-based components. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I caught a syndicated New York Times article on Voice-over-IP (VoIP) on Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) networks. I went to the Philstar.com website but didn&#8217;t find a soft copy of it. However, it definitely is in the print version. Anyway, to get straight to the point, the article says that Voice-over-IP over WiFi (which I will from this moment on call VoWiFi) is definitely an interesting piece of new technology but will face fierce resistance from the incumbent mobile network operators. The scenario the MNOs probably fear is the one I presented in my previous blog on a purely IP-based Mobile Network Operator. Some provider will might take this opportunity to create a wireless voice overlay using all IP-based components. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: It&#8217;s hip2b2 (Mobile, Security, Web 2.0, Pipe Dreams and More) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; City WiFi and Mobile Phone WiFi: Match Made in Ether?</title>
		<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-296</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 03:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-296</guid>
					<description>[...] Inspite of the apparent MNO rejection, we are definitely not far away from having a purely IP-based mobile network operator. The ingredients are falling into place faster than I have imagined possible. Today, WiFi calling is simply an alternative. It cannot possibly provide the range and coverage needed to become a full MNO. However, when a more pervasive mobile WiMAX is introduced. Market dynamics will definitely have to change. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Inspite of the apparent MNO rejection, we are definitely not far away from having a purely IP-based mobile network operator. The ingredients are falling into place faster than I have imagined possible. Today, WiFi calling is simply an alternative. It cannot possibly provide the range and coverage needed to become a full MNO. However, when a more pervasive mobile WiMAX is introduced. Market dynamics will definitely have to change. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wyuwp</title>
		<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>The Nokia E61 already comes with a VoIP and SIP stack. You can find instructions on how to use this handset to make "Internet calls" &lt;a href="http://www.jasons.org/archives/403" rel="nofollow"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Now this solves the handset problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nokia E61 already comes with a VoIP and SIP stack. You can find instructions on how to use this handset to make &#8220;Internet calls&#8221; <a href="http://www.jasons.org/archives/403" rel="nofollow">here</a>. Now this solves the handset problems.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wyuwp</title>
		<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-286</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 23:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-286</guid>
					<description>Nokia is doing &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060727/wr_nm/nokia_uma_dc" rel="nofollow"&gt;UMA Trials&lt;/a&gt; in Oulu, Finland. The dream of voice calls over-IP on mobile is steadily becoming a reality. Will these technologies trigger a new kind of MNO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nokia is doing <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060727/wr_nm/nokia_uma_dc" rel="nofollow">UMA Trials</a> in Oulu, Finland. The dream of voice calls over-IP on mobile is steadily becoming a reality. Will these technologies trigger a new kind of MNO?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wyuwp</title>
		<link>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-285</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://hip2b2.yutivo.org/2006/07/27/ip-based-mobile-network-operator-skype-mno/#comment-285</guid>
					<description>Additionally, Skype has also signed a deal with &lt;a href="http://www.mblox.com/mblox/news/view.asp?id=49" rel="nofollow"&gt;mBlox&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additionally, Skype has also signed a deal with <a href="http://www.mblox.com/mblox/news/view.asp?id=49" rel="nofollow">mBlox</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
